Alicia
Dermer, MD, IBCLC
Old Bridge NJ USA
Old Bridge NJ USA
From: NEW BEGINNINGS, Vol. 18 No. 4, July-August 2001, p. 124-127
Very
few people are unaware of the benefits of breastfeeding for babies, but the
many benefits to the mother are often overlooked or even unknown. From the
effect of oxytocin on the uterus to the warm emotional gains, breastfeeding
gives a mother many reasons to be pleased with her choice. These documented
effects are outlined in this excerpt from Breastfeeding Annual International
2001, a recently published anthology which was edited by Dia Michels,
co-author of the classic breastfeeding advocacy book, Milk, Money, and
Madness. Both books are available from LLLI.
One
of the best-kept secrets about breastfeeding is that it's as healthy for
mothers as for babies. Not only does lactation continue the natural physiologic
process begun with conception and pregnancy, but it provides many short and
long-term health benefits. These issues are rarely emphasized in prenatal
counseling by health care professionals and all but ignored in popular
parenting literature. Let's look at all the benefits breastfeeding provides
mothers and speculate as to why so few are finding out about them.
Physiologic Effects of Breastfeeding
Immediately
after birth, the repeated suckling of the baby releases oxytocin from the
mother's pituitary gland. This hormone not only signals the breasts to release
milk to the baby (this is known as the milk ejection reflex, or
"let-down"), but simultaneously produces contractions in the uterus.
The resulting contractions prevent postpartum hemorrhage and promote uterine
involution (the return to a nonpregnant state).
Bottle-feeding
mothers frequently receive synthetic oxytocin at birth through an intravenous
line, but for the next few days, while they are at highest risk of postpartum
hemorrhage, they are on their own. As long as a mother breastfeeds without
substituting formula, foods, or pacifiers for feedings at the breast, the
return of her menstrual periods is delayed (Lawrence and Lawrence 1999). Unlike
bottle-feeding mothers, who typically get their periods back within six to
eight weeks, breastfeeding mothers can often stay amenorrheic for several
months. This condition has the important benefit of conserving iron in the mother's
body and often provides natural spacing of pregnancies.
The
amount of iron a mother's body uses in milk production is much less than the
amount she would lose from menstrual bleeding. The net effect is a decreased
risk of iron-deficiency anemia in the breastfeeding mother as compared with her
formula-feeding counterpart. The longer the mother nurses and keeps her periods
at bay, the stronger this effect (Institute of Medicine 1991).
As
for fertility, the lactational amenorrhea method (LAM) is a well-documented
contraceptive method, with 98 to 99 percent prevention of pregnancy in the
first six months. The natural child-spacing achieved through LAM ensures the
optimal survival of each child, and the physical recovery of the mother between
pregnancies. In contrast, the bottle-feeding mother needs to start
contraception within six weeks of the birth (Kennedy 1989).
Long-Term Benefits of Breastfeeding
It
is now becoming clear that breastfeeding provides mothers with more than just
short-term benefits in the early period after birth.
A
number of studies have shown other potential health advantages that mothers can
enjoy through breastfeeding. These include optimal metabolic profiles, reduced
risk of various cancers, and psychological benefits.
Production
of milk is an active metabolic process, requiring the use of 200 to 500
calories per day, on average. To use up this many calories, a bottlefeeding
mother would have to swim at least 30 laps in a pool or bicycle uphill for an
hour daily. Clearly, breastfeeding mothers have an edge on losing weight gained
during pregnancy. Studies have confirmed that nonbreastfeeding mothers lose
less weight and don't keep it off as well as breastfeeding mothers (Brewer
1989).
The
above finding is particularly important for mothers who have had diabetes
during their pregnancies. After birth, mothers with a history of gestational
diabetes who breastfeed have lower blood sugars than nonbreastfeeding mothers
(Kjos 1993). For these women who are already at increased risk of developing
diabetes, the optimal weight loss from breastfeeding may translate into a
decreased risk of diabetes in later life.
Women
with Type I diabetes prior to their pregnancies tend to need less insulin while
they breastfeed due to their reduced sugar levels. Breastfeeding mothers tend
to have a high HDL cholesterol (Oyer 1989). The optimal weight loss, improved
blood sugar control, and good cholesterol profile provided by breastfeeding may
ultimately pay off with a lower risk of heart problems. This is especially
important since heart attacks are the leading cause of death in women.
Another
important element used in producing milk is calcium. Because women lose calcium
while lactating, some health professionals have mistakenly assumed an increased
risk of osteoporosis for women who breastfeed. However, current studies show
that after weaning their children, breastfeeding mothers' bone density returns
to prepregnancy or even higher levels (Sowers 1995). In the longterm, lactation
may actually result in stronger bones and reduced risk of osteoporosis. In
fact, recent studies have confirmed that women who did not breastfeed have a
higher risk of hip fractures after menopause (Cummings 1993).
Non-breastfeeding
mothers have been shown in numerous studies to have a higher risk of
reproductive cancers. Ovarian and uterine cancers have been found to be more
common in women who did not breastfeed. This may be due to the repeated
ovulatory cycles and exposure to higher levels of estrogen from not
breastfeeding. Although numerous studies have looked at the relationship
between breastfeeding and breast cancer, the results have been conflicting.
This is largely due to flaws in study design and lack of uniform definition of
breastfeeding, resulting in difficulty comparing the data. (In some studies,
breastfeeding has been defined as having breastfed at least once a day, while
in others it is defined as exclusive breastfeeding, using no supplements or
artificial nipples.) Despite this, it is now estimated that breastfeeding from
six to 24 months throughout a mother's reproductive lifetime may reduce the
risk of breast cancer by 11 to 25 percent (Lyde 1989; Newcomb 1994). This
phenomenon may also be due to suppressed ovulation and low estrogen, but a
local effect relating to the normal physiologic function of the breast may also
be involved. This was suggested by a study in which mothers who traditionally
breastfed on only one side had significantly higher rates of cancer in the unsuckled
breast (Ing, Ho, and Petrakis 1977).
In
two studies, there appeared to be an increase in flare-ups of rheumatoid
arthritis in breastfeeding mothers (Jorgensen 1996; Brenna 1994). However, in
another study, overall severity and mortality of rheumatoid arthritis was worse
in women who had never breastfed (Brun, Nilson, and Kvale 1995). There have
been no other studies showing any detrimental health effects to women from
breastfeeding. Bottom line: Breastfeeding reduces risk factors for three of the
most serious diseases for women-female cancers, heart disease, and
osteoporosis-without any significant health risks.
Psychological Issues for Breastfeeding Mothers
How
do you measure the peace of mind of having a healthy baby who is developing
optimally? Where do you factor in the financial burden of formula prices and
increased medical costs?
Public
health agencies advocate for breastfeeding because of its well-documented
health advantages to babies, but they fail to convey to individual mothers and
families the potential emotional impact of this very crucial infant-feeding
decision. In Western society, the decision about breast or bottle is still seen
very much as a personal choice based on convenience. The potential stress of
living with a child with recurrent illnesses, or the loss of the unique bond
that comes from breastfeeding, are often omitted from the decision-making
process.
There
is much more to breastfeeding than the provision of optimal nutrition and
protection from disease through mother's milk. Breastfeeding provides a unique
interaction between mother and child, an automatic, skin-to-skin closeness and
nurturing that bottle-feeding mothers have to work to replicate. The child's
suckling at the breast produces a special hormonal milieu for the mother.
Prolactin, the milk-making hormone, appears to produce a special calmness in
mothers. Breastfeeding mothers have been shown to have a less intense response
to adrenaline (Altemus 1995).
This
calming effect is hard to measure in a society largely unsupportive of
breastfeeding such as the United States, where breastfeeding beyond the early
weeks is not the norm. Mothers who try to breastfeed in this climate often
experience physical and emotional problems. These problems result from a lack
of breastfeeding role models among family and friends, and are compounded by
the easy availability of formula and a lack of access to knowledgeable and
supportive health care professionals.
Even
if a mother overcomes physical problems, she may still encounter negative comments,
such as "Are you still nursing?" or "Your milk may not be strong
enough-why don't you add formula?" Or her employer may make it impossible
for her to continue breastfeeding on returning to work. Or she may be harassed
for breastfeeding in public. No wonder that few mothers get to fully experience
the relaxing effects of breastfeeding.
New
motherhood is a time fraught with emotion. The baby blues are common, often
exacerbated by lack of support and a sense of isolation. The role of
breastfeeding in postpartum emotional upheavals has not been well studied, but
breastfeeding mothers with depression need treatment just as much as any other
mother. Such women present a unique challenge to health care professionals.
Since medications may pass into breast milk, many physicians believe the safest
solution is to wean the child. However, in most cases of depression, women do
better if they continue to breastfeed. Unfortunately, too often physicians
insist that mothers wean their child in order to take antidepressant medicines.
A
review of the literature, however, has demonstrated that several
antidepressants pose minimal, if any, risk to the nursing child. A mother who
feels that her nursing relationship with her child is the only thing going
right in her life can now continue to breastfeed while receiving appropriate
medications for her depression.
Why Don't More People Know How Good Breastfeeding Is?
Clearly,
breastfeeding is good for mothers both physically and emotionally. And yet,
many mothers decide to breastfeed based solely on the benefits to the baby.
Breastfeeding in the context of a bottle-feeding society tends to be
perceived as inconvenient and uncomfortable.
Often,
mothers see breastfeeding as martyrdom to be endured for their baby's health.
If they stop early, they may feel guilty about depriving the baby of some
health benefits, but their guilt is often soothed by well-meaning people who
reassure them that "The baby will do just as well on formula."
Perhaps if they knew that continuing to breastfeed is also good for their own
health, some mothers might be less likely to quit when they run into
problems.
Many
mothers are not being told how good breastfeeding is for their health.
Whether out of ignorance or due to the influence of the artificial baby milk
industry, many health care providers fail to inform mothers of the facts.
It's time for this well-kept secret to come out. As word spreads about these
little-known facts, more mothers will not merely choose to breastfeed briefly
to provide early disease protection for their baby, but will continue to
breastfeed, providing optimal outcomes both for their children and for
themselves.
|
Alicia
Dermer, MD, IBCLC, is Clinical Associate Professor in the Department of Family
Medicine at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood
Johnson Medical School in New Brunswick, New Jersey. She has a special interest
in wellness and health promotion. As part of this interest, she has gained
expertise in breastfeeding education and promotion. She successfully sat for
the certifying examination of the International Board of Lactation Examiners in
1995. She lectures extensively on the subject of lactation, is actively
involved in health care professional and lay education about breastfeeding, and
has several publications on the subject.
References:
Altemus,
M. et al. Suppresion of hypothalmic-pituitary-adrenal axis responses to stress
in lactating women. J Clin Endocrinal Metab 1995;80:2954.
Brenna,
P. Breast-feeding and the onset of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum
1994; 6: 808.
Brun,
J., Nilssen, S., Kvale, G. Breast feeding, other reproductive factors and
rheumatoid arthritis: A prospective study. Br J Rhemmatol 1995;34:542.
Brewer,
M.M., Bates, M.R., Vannoy, L.P. Postpartum changes in maternal weight and body
fat deposits in lactating vs. lnonlactating women. Am J Clin Nurs 1989;
49: 259.
Dewey,
K. Heinig, M., Nommsen, L. Maternal weight-loss patterns during prolonged
lactation. Am J Clin Nurs 1993; 58: 162.
Hale,
Thomas. Medications and Mothers' Milk Amarillo, TX: Pharmasoft Medical
Publishing, 2000.
Ing,
K, Ho, J., Petrakis, N. Unilateral breastfeeding and breast cancer. Lancet
1977; 2: 124.
Jorgensen,
C. et al. Oral contraception, parity, breast feeding, and severity of
rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheumatic Dis 1996; 55: 94.
Kramer,
F., Stunkard, A., Marshall, K, et al. Breastfeeding reduces maternal lower-body
fat. J Am Diet Assoc 1993; 93: 429.
Kjos,
S. Henry O. Lee, R., eta al. Effect of lactation on glucose and lipid
metabolism in women with recent gestational diabetes. [i]Obstet Gynecol[/i]
1993; 82:451.
Lawrence,
R., Lawrence, R. Breastfeeding:A Guide for the Medical Profession. St.
Louis: Mosby, 1999.
Layde,
P., et al. The independent associations parity, age at first full term
pregnancy, and duration of breastfeeding with the risk of breast cancer J
Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 963.
Newcomb,
P. et al. Lactation and a reduced risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. N
Engl J Med 1994; 330: 81.
Oyer,
D., Stone, N. Cholesterol levels and the breastfeeding mom. JAMA 1989,
262:2092.
No comments:
Post a Comment